How many employees actually received the information? Which teams are disengaging? Which formats work? Answer with reliable figures, and leave with an action plan.
The actual reading of each communication, compared with your averages and those of comparable companies.
The sites, jobs and populations that are disengaging, and the channels that would suit them better.
Concrete recommendations: timing, formats, frequency, channels. And the option to apply them in one click.
Reads on the intranet and app, quiz and survey responses, clicks: solid measures, with their limits stated.
By population, by type of message, over time: the gaps reveal what works and what does not.
Remind a population, change channel, space out sends, then see the effect the following month.

Named tracking is limited to receipt and confirmation of messages. Analyses and reports are always presented by site, job or entity.
No result is shown for a group too small to guarantee anonymity.
Statistics are calculated by the platform. AI comments on them, it does not invent them.
Statistics are included in every plan. The AI monthly report is an add-on.
Not entirely: some email clients hide or simulate them. That is why our analyses rely first on reads in the intranet and app, clicks and responses, and clearly flag the estimated share.
Yes. The monthly report places your results against comparable companies, based on aggregated and anonymised data. No client's data is visible to another.
No. Statistics measure the reach of your communication, not people. Results are presented by population, and no result is shown for a group too small to preserve anonymity.
Yes. The monthly report is designed to be read in two minutes and can be exported for your presentations.
In 30 minutes, we show you what your current statistics do not tell you.